ON UPPER BOUNDS OF H2,1(f) AND H2,2(f) HANKEL DETERMINANTS FOR A SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS

Authors

  • MUHAMMET KAMALI Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/92meyb89

Abstract

In this paper, we give upper bounds of the Hankel determinants
H2,1(f) and H2,2(f) for the classes S

(λ,n)
, where f is analytic in the open unit
disk ∆ = {z ∈ C : |z| < 1} and normalized so that f(z) = z +a2z
2 +a3z
3 +. . .

References

[1] Ozaki, S., On the theory of multivalent functions, II. Sci.Rep. Tokyo Bunrika Daigaku. Sect.

A4, 1941,45-87.

[2] Kargar, R., and Ebadian, A., Ozaki’s conditions for general integral operator, Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis 5, 1 (2017), 61-67.

[3] Umezawa, T., Analytic functions convex in one direction, J. Math. Soc. Japan 4(1952), 194-

202.

[4] Sakaguchi, K., A property of convex functions and an application to criteria for univalence.,

Bull. Nara Univ. Ed. Natur. Sci. 22, 2 (1973), 1-5.

[5] Singh, R., and Singh, S., Some sufficient conditions for univalence and starlikeness. Colloq.

Math. 47,2 (1982),309-314.

[6] Pommerenke C., On the coecients and Hankel determinants of univalent functions, J. Lond.

Math. Soc., 41, 111-122,1966.

[7] Pommerenke C., On the Hankel determinants of univalent functions, Mathematika, 14 108-

112,1967.

[8] A. Janteng, S.A. Halim and M.Darus , Coefficient inequality for a function whose derivative

has a positive real part, J.Inequal. Pure Appl.Math., 7,(2006),1-5.

[9] A. Janteng, S.A. Halim and M. Darus, Hankel determinant for starlike and convex functions,

Int. J.Math.Anal.,1,(2007),619-625.

[10] K.O.Babalola, On H3,1(f) Hankel determinants for some classes of univalent functions, Inequality theory and applications, vol. 6, (2010), pp. 1-7.

[11] S.Altınkaya, S. Yal¸cın, Third Hankel determinant for Bazilevic functions. Adv. Math., 5,

(2016), 91–96.

[12] D. Bansal, S. Maharana, J.K. Prajapat, Third order Hankel Determinant for certain univalent

functions. J. Korean Math. Soc. , 52, (2015),1139-1148.

[13] D.V. Krishna, B.Venkateswarlu, T.RamReddy, Third Hankel determinant for bounded turning functions of order alpha. J. Niger. Math. Soc., 34, (2015), 121-127.

[14] M. Raza, S.N. Malik, Upper bound of third Hankel determinant for a class of analytic functions related with lemniscate of Bernoulli. J. Inequal. Appl.,( 2013), 412.

[15] G. Shanmugam, B.A. Stephen, K.O. Babalola, Third Hankel determinant for α starlike functions. Gulf J. Math. , 2, (2014),107-113.

[16] Zaprawa, P. Third Hankel determinants for subclasses of univalent functions. Mediterr. J.

Math., 14, 19, 2017.

[17] B.Kowalczyk, A. Lecko, Y.J. Sim,The sharp bound of the Hankel determinant of the third

kind for convex functions. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. , 97,(2018), 435-445.

[18] A. Lecko, Y.J. Sim, B. Smiarowska,The sharp bound of the Hankel determinant of the third

kind for starlike functions of order 1/2. Complex Anal. Oper. Theory, (2018), 1-8.

[19] M. Arif, M. Raza, H. Tang, S. Hussain and H. Khan, Hankel determinant of order three for

familiar subsets of analytic functions related with sine function. Open Math., 17, (2019),1615-

1630.

[20] L. Shi, I. Ali, M. Arif ,N.E. Cho, S.Hussain and H. Khan, A Study of Third Hankel Determinant Problem for Certain Subfamilies of Analytic Functions Involving Cardioid Domain,

Mathematics, 7, (2019), 418.

[21] P.Zaprawa, Hankel Determinant for Univalent Functions Related to the Exponential Function, symmetry, 11, 1211, (2019).

[22] Gr.˚At. Salagean, Subclasses of Univalent Functions, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1013,

Springer-Verlag, Berlin, (1983), pp. 362-372.

[23] F.M. Al-Oboudi, On univalent functions defined by a generalized Salagean operat¨or, Indian

J. Math. Math. Sci. 25-28, (2004), pp.1429-1436.

[24] I.O. Oros, G. Oros, On a class of univalent functions defined by a generalized Salagean

operat

Published

2026-07-18

How to Cite

[1]
MUHAMMET KAMALItran. 2026. ON UPPER BOUNDS OF H2,1(f) AND H2,2(f) HANKEL DETERMINANTS FOR A SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS. Journal of Mathematical Analysis. 14, 2 (Jul. 2026), 30–40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/92meyb89.