AnImplementation of the Entropy Method for Determining Weighing Coefficientsin a Multicriteria Optimization of Public Procurements
Abstract
Determining the weights of criteria is a key problem in multicriteria analysis models. The problem of choosing an appropriate methodof determining criteria weights in problems of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) is a very important stage. Most authors suggest classifyingthe models of determining the weights of criteria into subjective and objective models. This paper presents the application of the Entropy methodfor determining criteria weights. The Entropy method is tested in the MCDM problem in public procurements. The results show that the Entropy methodshouldn't be used as a correction method because in most cases, the decision maker Also shows that applying the Entropy method in MCDM problems for determining weighing coefficients can be counterproductive.
References
[12]Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K., Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making.Multiple
attribute decision making: methods and applicationsa state-of-the-art survey, pp. 58-191.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3.
[13]Jahan, A., Edwards, K. L., & Bahraminasab, M. (2016).Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting theselection of
engineering materials in product design. Butterworth-Heinemann.
[14]Živković, M., Milosavljević, M. M., & Žižović, M. (2016). Multicriteria approach to public procurementfor technical
sector in Serbian public companies.Fiability & Durability/Fiabilitate si Durabilitate,1, 181-187.
[15]Kousar, S., & Kausar, N. (2024). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Sustainable Agritourism: An Integrated Fuzzy-
Rough Approach.Spectrum of Operational Research, 2(1), 134-150.https://doi.org/10.31181/sor21202515.
[16]Kumar, R. (2024). Global Trends and Research Patterns in Financial Literacy and Behavior: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Management Science Advances, 2(1), 1-18.https://doi.org/10.31181/msa2120256.
[17]Trung, D. D. (2022). Development of data normalization methods for multi-criteria decision making: applying for
MARCOS method.Manufacturing Review, 9, 22.https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2022019.
[18]Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R. A., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2016). Normalization techniques for multi-criteria decision
making: analytical hierarchy process case study. InTechnological innovation for cyber-physical systems: 7th IFIP WG 5.5/SOCOLNET advanced doctoral conference on computing, electrical and industrial systems, DoCEIS 2016, Costa de Caparica, Portugal, April 11–13, 2016, Proceedings 7 (pp. 261-269). Springer International Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31165-4_26.
[19]Yüksel, S., & Dinçer, H. (2024). A Decision-MakingFramework for the Development of Molten-Salt Reactors:
Prioritizing Environmental and Technological Factors.Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 3(1), 18-25.https://doi.org/10.31181/jscda31202547.
[20]Abbas, Z., Rafiq, M. Y., Hasnain, J., Mustafa, G. ., & Arsalan, M. S. (2024). Enhanced Thermal Study in Hybrid
Nanofluid Flow through a Channel Motivated by Water/Cu+Al2o3 and Entropy Generation.Spectrum of Mechanical Engineering and Operational Research, 1(1), 131-144.https://doi.org/10.31181/smeor1120249.
[21]Kousar, S., Ansar, A., Kausar, N., & Freen, G. (2024). Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Smog Mitigation: A
Comprehensive Analysis of Health, Economic, and Ecological Impacts.Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 2(1), 53-67.https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap2120258.
[22]Kizielewicz, B., & Sałabun, W. (2024). SITW Method:A New Approach to Re-identifying Multi-criteria Weights in
Complex Decision Analysis.Spectrum of Mechanical Engineering and OperationalResearch, 1(1), 215-226.https://doi.org/10.31181/smeor11202419.
[23]Aditi Biswas, Kamal Hossain Gazi, Prodip Bhaduri, &Mondal, S. P. (2024). Site Selection for Girls Hostel in a
University Campus by MCDM based Strategy.Spectrum of Decision Making and Applications, 2(1), 68-93.https://doi.org/10.31181/sdmap21202511.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Spectrum of Engineering and Management Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the SEMS Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.


All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under the